EXHIBIT 3L

EXHIBIT 3L

The Proper Response to Rhonda Sails's Exhibit P

Rhonda Sails/(Ms. Achtem) questions from page 124, line 5 to line 18;

"An E-mail dated November 17th, is Exhibit "P". Again in Reference to this e-mail, you stated:
I’m offering to accept 9,000 to give our Medicine Hat Home and mortgage.
And then further on in the e-mail you state:
Just to make matters even more simple I will accept 9,000 then you’ll become 100 percent owner of the Medicine Hat home.
Is this correct that you made this statement?"


If I was not so confused and thrown off Kilter by Justice Horner being the cause, that allowed Rhonda Sails’s to ambush me with fresh new Exhibits. If Justice Horner had fulfilled her duty as a judge to be well versed with Trial parameters or if she had not neglected Trial Parameters that Justice Rawlins set out at Pre-trial. If Justice Horner had protect my rights as a citizen to access of Law "An Act Respecting Witnesses and Evidence" pursuant to section 28(1) and 28(2) of the Canada Evidence Act C-5, and Alberta Rule of Court Rule of Court 158.5(1)(e). Then I would have not had my rights of knowing what I was being cross-examined on stepped on. Then I would have not been so confused when having to answer to Rhonda Sails’s Exhibit P. Justice Karen Horner neglect of her duties as a judge or her non equal female biast values prevented me to answer to Rhonda Sails’s Exhibit P for the record like this;

"Yes miss Achtem, your Exhibit P is an e-mail I sent you which was a more than reasonable proposal I made you during my time of crisis. You abandoned you marriage Vows you made to me at St. Patricks Church that you made to me in Medidine Hat on September 10, 1994. You abandoned me because of Multiple Sclerosis detiorating me, later lead an MS attack that made me become disabled.

"I made you this generous reasonable a time of crisis, when MS riddleling me causing me to become finacially unstable. I made you an offer out of desitude. An offer that would have yielded you a huge whopping lopsided split of matrimonial property in your favour Ms. Achtem. This was an offer that you did not accept."